The Problem: Wasting Hours on Contract Review
As a lawyer, you know the frustration. A client asks, *"Does our contract allow early termination?"* You spend 20 minutes skimming through a 50-page PDF, then another 10 checking related emails. According to a 2023 legal efficiency survey, attorneys waste **12 hours per week** just searching for clauses.
Ctrl+F fails when terms appear in tables or scanned PDFs. Manual review risks missing critical variations (*"terminate" vs. "cancel"*). But what if you could pinpoint exact clauses—**without uploading sensitive data to the cloud?**
Solution: WordsDigger for Legal Teams
1. Deep Search Across File Types (Including Scanned PDF Text)
- Problem:Key clauses hide in DOCX, PDFs, or even old PPT files from partner firms.
- Solution:WordsDigger scans all text layers (except image-based PDFs) in one search.
- Example: Search *"force majeure"* across:
- Active contracts (DOCX)
- Archived scans (PDF)
- Client emails (HTML)
- Sample Case:* A London law firm reduced M&A due diligence time by **65%** using folder-specific searches.
- ---
![Screenshot: WordsDigger searching "indemnification" across 3 file types]
2. Case-Insensitive Matching for Legal Variations
- Problem:Opposing counsel uses *"Breach"* while your template says *"breach"*.
- Solution:WordsDigger ignores capitalization, finding all variants.
- Try: *"material adverse change"* → also detects *"Material Adverse Change"*.
3. Offline Security for Confidential Documents
- Key Feature:Zero data leaves your computer. Verify via:
- Windows Resource Monitor → No network activity after license check.
- Sample Case:A Swiss privacy firm chose WordsDigger over cloud tools to comply with GDPR.
- ---
Limited Offer for Legal Professionals
WordsDigger's **14-Day Refund Policy**.
Risk Warning:Sticking with manual review costs the average firm **$28,000/year** in billable hours (2023 LegalTech report).